The Fed’s Rate Path Is Too Cautious to Fix Housing

The Federal Reserve has long been able to depend on the housing boost from interest rate cuts juicing the US economy. This time looks different.

More than a percentage point of central bank easing and another percentage point of expected easing have done little to reassure the residential construction industry. As buyers stay on the sidelines, a growing pessimism about the near-term outlook is taking hold among companies. It’s unlikely that the rate-cut trajectory we’re currently on will halt a decline in construction activity and employment, an ominous sign for economic growth and the labor market next year.

The strongest, but by no means only, piece of evidence we have for this came last week from America’s second-largest homebuilder, Lennar Corp. Unlike most rivals, Lennar’s strategy is to keep housing production steady and let profit margins move up and down as market conditions change. In its view, this is a more efficient model when it comes to land and labor relationships than adjusting production levels in response to demand volatility. So it was noteworthy that Lennar finally acknowledged that the weak housing market no longer supports the level of production the company has maintained, and executives decided to trim activity while they wait for things to stabilize.

There are two main reasons they did this. First, Lennar’s profit margins are hovering around the lowest levels since the late 2000s as use of buyer incentives such as mortgage rate buydowns have climbed. Incentives now amount to 14.3% of average sales prices versus 5-6% normally, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. And second, more ominously, despite the decline in mortgage rates “stronger sales have not yet followed,” according to Chief Executive Officer Stuart Miller.

Lennar’s downbeat outlook has been echoed in warnings from other companies tied to residential construction.