The Skill of Knowing What Not To Automate With AI

Adrian JohnstoneTech leaders at RIAs have spent the past few years looking at the tools underpinning the business of financial advice and asking, “What can we automate next?” When I watch firms evaluate advisor technology, the sharpest leaders go one step further and ask, “Why are we automating in the first place?”

At first blush, the answers are obvious: You want more efficiency and the ability to serve more clients. Lowering overhead and increasing productivity are straightforward ways to improve the bottom line, and RIAs have gotten quite good at this type of automation to the benefit of their businesses.

Generative AI excites us because the large language models (LLMs) and ability to process unstructured data allow firms to consider automating parts of the business that, until now, have been difficult to delegate to a machine.

But should you?

I’m not entirely convinced that ruthless, maximal efficiency should be the goal of a financial advisor. At the risk of sounding glib, an advisor is supposed to deliver financial advice. None of your prospects are searching for “the most efficient RIA in Florida.” Automation should serve a single purpose: to free advisors to spend more time with clients where their judgment and experience truly matter.

I have the good fortune to work closely with a lot of RIAs that I believe are approaching AI automation in a smart, human-first way. Here’s what I learned from them.

Automate the Work That Pulls You Away From Clients

Most advisory teams carry heavy administrative loads. Hours are spent summarizing meetings, documenting conversations, building workflows, interpreting notes, and creating tasks — this isn’t news to anyone. Clients can tell when their advisor is distracted, and advisors certainly feel it when back-office work crowds out preparation, prospecting, or meaningful follow-up.