China’s Property Market: Bubble or Balloon?

Despite long-running international concerns about China’s property “bubble,” the market has proven quite resilient. The Chinese government has instituted various austerity measures to cool the market, but buoyant demand for property has helped avoid any serious downturn.

A number of factors continue to support the Chinese property sector, including the increasing urbanization rate, abundant liquidity and a lack of investment alternatives. As a result, although we expect the market to slow gradually in 2018, we see attractive opportunities for bond investors in the sector, particularly among larger real estate developers.

Urbanization and the demand for housing

Since 2000, the percentage of China’s population living in urban areas has risen from 36% to 58%. Over that period, 300 million Chinese have migrated from rural to urban areas, creating huge demand for new housing.

This demand varies substantially across regions and cities. Generally speaking, the real estate market along the East Coastal areas is the most robust, underpinned by positive population inflows and strong economic growth. However, it is also more exposed to policy tightening due to higher property prices. The fundamental outlook for most inland lower-tier cities is less attractive as a result of continued population outflows.

Government intervention helps keep market on track

China’s M2, which represents the broader money supply, has been growing at double-digits over the past two decades. China’s capital controls have largely restricted the Chinese population from investing this money in overseas markets, but there are limitations to the available onshore investment channels. Onshore interest rates remain low (both in terms of bond yields and bank deposits) and the domestic equity market is notoriously volatile. As a result, for many Chinese the property market has become one of the most attractive investment options. While this has led to concerns about a potential bubble, China’s property market is highly influenced by the government’s stance towards the sector.