Pick Your Poison: Higher Inflation or Slower Growth?

Key takeaways

  • Tariffs will likely cause growth to slump and inflation to rise
  • Fed officials will have to decide whether full employment or price stability is a higher priority
  • We expect one to two Fed rate cuts by the end of the year

The Fed’s in a bind. Policy uncertainty is high. And tariffs are likely to hit the U.S. economy with a “stagflation-lite” impulse in coming quarters—weaker growth and higher prices.

How will central bankers prioritize their full employment and price stability mandates in the rare circumstance where they’re losing ground on both goals at the same time? And how do they make policy decisions when the economic outlook is so unclear?

It's complicated

Stagflation complicates the calculus for a central bank. Weaker growth would warrant rate cuts. Higher prices argue in favor of hikes. Fed Chair Jerome Powell detailed the Fed’s approach to this scenario in a recent statement, described neatly in recent remarks. “We would consider how far the economy is from each goal, and the potentially different time horizons over which those respective gaps would be anticipated to close.”

Put differently, the bigger—and more persistent—miss is what will get emphasized, whether that’s sluggish growth or rising inflation. Enter version 2.0 of the “transitory” debate. Do tariffs cause a one-time increase in prices or do they generate more persistent inflation, affecting longer-term expectations? Those that believe the former will have a more dovish outlook and focus on protecting full employment—and vice versa.

There are a range of views on this issue, including among Fed leadership.

Fed Roundup table