What's Going On…With Inflation

"Complation"…Is there too much complacency regarding inflation? The latest batch of official inflation readings have been fairly benign, begging a question about whether the tariff impact is more bark than bite. As shown below, neither headline nor core (ex-food/energy) consumer price index (CPI) readings were signal flags in May. Core goods prices, which are most directly impacted by tariffs, were flat, meaning the year-over-year (y/y) change was the same as in April; while there are categories putting downward pressure on inflation, including the shelter components and wages.

CPI tame…for now
CPI tame...for now graph

The rub is that much of the economic data outside of direct inflation readings suggest higher inflation ahead. Both key purchasing managers indexes (PMIs)—the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) and S&P Global—show that output prices have jumped to levels akin to the early part of the pandemic. The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) survey is also showing that a higher-than-average number of small businesses are raising prices, or plan to. Many high-profile larger companies have announced price increases as well—including Walmart, Macy's, Proctor & Gamble, Ford, Subaru, Volvo, Volkswagen, Mitsubishi, Mattel, Adidas, Ralph Lauren, Stanley Black & Decker, Best Buy, Microsoft, and Nintendo.

What's also notable is the still-wide gap between the discretionary ("wants") and non-discretionary ("needs") components of the CPI. As shown below, although there has been some convergence between the two, needs' prices are running at about twice the level of wants' prices; disproportionately hurting lower-income consumers.

Needs > wants
Needs/Wants

At the producer level, price pressures are still evident but not yet worrisome. Shown below are the y/y and core changes in the producer price index (PPI), which have rolled over slightly but are still in an uptrend since mid-2023.