Revolution—Not Evolution: The Crypto Dilemma

New asset class. Important portfolio diversifier. Same old drama.

Even as stablecoins—the on and off ramp to the crypto ecosystem—gain regulatory clarity and broadening support, there remains deep skepticism about the decentralized networks that stablecoins access and ongoing debate about whether these offerings represent a new source of growth and value. Too many respected financial leaders continue to cling to views established in the earliest years of bitcoin development and maintain a knee-jerk rejection to the entire crypto landscape, ignoring both bitcoin’s maturation and the extensive value being created across a growing set of blockchains and decentralized applications.

Reticence to consider the investment case for crypto holdings, despite the ecosystem now generating trillions of dollars of transactional value, can be partially linked to many professional investors still associating crypto with the anti-establishment ethos of its cypherpunk origins and their outdated view that the ecosystem is lacking controls and thus facilitates illicit activities as was the case in the “Silk Road” years of the early 2010s. Many potential investors are unaware of the institutionalization of crypto that has taken place.

By far the most limiting factor, however, is that too many potential investors do not yet understand the business model driving the crypto ecosystem or how the coins and tokens they issue enable the growth of these businesses or what the financial benefits are of holding these coins and tokens as an investment. There is not yet a broad-based understanding that crypto represents an entirely new asset class with an entirely new economic paradigm and set of exposures.