The Economy’s Case for Lower Rates

We disagree with the way the current administration is pressuring the Federal Reserve (Fed) to lower interest rates because lowering rates must not be a political decision; it must stand on its own economic and monetary policy merits. Doing otherwise risks de-anchoring inflationary expectations, threatening the objectives of low and stable inflation. There are plenty of historical examples across the global economy (Argentina and Turkey), of the risks of losing central bank independence from the political process and what it means for inflation as well as for the value of that country’s currency.

Our first economic argument is that the Fed’s tight monetary policy was not the most important factor in bringing inflation down after its onset, as the economy recovered from the pandemic. The Fed’s monetary policy stance probably did contribute to keeping inflation expectations relatively anchored, but inflation came down as excess savings accumulated during the pandemic dwindled and as pandemic supply chain disruptions came to an end.

Second, the Fed had to keep interest rates high because the economy was growing above potential due to several factors. As we said above, Americans had accumulated plenty of excess savings and had been unloading them at will and a fast pace, pushing economic growth higher. At the same time, the Biden administration added three stimulus packages through the passing of three acts that pushed investment in new manufacturing plants and fiscal expenditures higher: the CHIPS Act, the IRA, and the Infrastructure Act. Thus, the Fed needed to conduct countercyclical monetary policy, i.e., high interest rates, to limit the potential inflationary effects coming from expansionary fiscal policies, adding upward pressure to economic growth.

disposable personal income