Fed Policy in the Fog of Missing Data

The ongoing U.S. government shutdown has policymakers – and investors – operating without much of the timely official data that usually inform their decisions. This could have a tangible impact on Federal Reserve policy in particular: Without crucial information on inflation and labor markets, the Fed could take a more cautious approach to interest rate moves while it awaits more clarity on the state of the U.S. economy.

A detailed review of the transcript of Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s press conference following last week’s Fed meeting suggests that the longer the shutdown drags on, the more the probability of a December rate cut diminishes, and January becomes more likely. Our base case is that the Fed will cut its policy rate at one of those meetings, bringing it to a range of 3.5%–3.75%. Beyond that, we believe it’s possible the Fed will pause at least until Powell’s term as Fed chair ends in May, as fiscal stimulus, including tax cuts and credits, supports the economy more forcefully in the first half of 2026. After that, the Fed could resume rate cuts in the second half of 2026 – assuming inflation is more clearly returning to the central bank’s 2% target, tariff effects fade, and risks to labor markets persist.

Labor market thresholds for Fed action

Last week at the press conference, Powell surprised market participants when he said a December cut was “not a foregone conclusion.” He cited the shutdown’s impact on economic data and linked another cut to further labor market deterioration (not just stabilization) – which likely means another uptick in the unemployment rate.

The last published household survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) showed unemployment at 4.3% in August, up from 4.1% in June. In September, the median Fed projection for the unemployment rate at the end of 2025 was 4.5% – so at that time, Fed officials were clearly concerned about negative labor market momentum. However, absent signs of a labor downturn materializing – which the Fed may not get due to the government shutdown – the Fed may determine a rate cut isn’t necessary in December.

Clashing policy and economic forces are weighing on the U.S. labor market

Monthly payroll growth has decelerated meaningfully this year from a roughly 100,000 per month pace of new jobs down to 50,000 (according to the most recent BLS reporting on the 6-month moving average of monthly net payroll gains after incorporating the preliminary benchmark revisions).

This dramatic decline has coincided with a similarly dramatic decline in population growth as policies under the Trump administration have reduced immigration and sought to limit the availability of or eliminate work permits. Based on these changes in population growth, we estimate that the number of monthly net payroll gains needed to keep the unemployment rate steady is currently around 50,000, down from closer to 200,000 at the height of the immigration-related population surge.

Since immigrants affect both the supply and demand for labor, the payroll growth decline this year has coincided with a more limited increase in the unemployment rate. Nevertheless, the unemployment rate has ticked up, suggesting falling labor demand is also having an effect. Since reaching a low of 3.4% in April 2023, the unemployment rate has since risen by 0.9 percentage points (ppts), as of the latest published BLS data.

This year, the ongoing economic adjustment to tariffs as well as the rapid diffusion of AI technology will likely drive the unemployment rate somewhat higher in the short run, even if these policies and trends create medium-term winners and losers. As we wrote in a September edition of Macro Signposts“U.S. Labor Markets: A Release Valve for Tariff Pressure?” – we think companies are focused on cutting labor costs as a way to defend margins against tariffs. This focus on labor cost savings is also likely driving faster implementation of AI. In the short run, we believe this weak labor demand will drive a somewhat higher unemployment rate and stagnant payroll growth, with still-positive real GDP growth.