When Geopolitics Becomes an Economic Input

Markets have long struggled to price geopolitical risk. Part of the issue is that each flare-up tends to be viewed as a one-off volatility jolt to be weathered and then faded once there is resolution.

Today, however, geopolitical risk is no longer a series of isolated events. It’s a defining feature of a more fragmented, multipolar world (for more, see our 2025 Secular Outlook, “The Fragmentation Era”). Multinational institutions no longer function as reliably as they once did. Stability has eroded.

Perhaps more than ever, geopolitics directly shapes trade flows, supply chains, industrial policy, energy security, defense spending, fiscal policy, inflation, and growth. In other words, geopolitics is now an essential economic input. As a result, it is an increasingly important input into investment decisions as well.

Passive investment strategies were well-suited to a world of low geopolitical risk, central bank balance sheet abundance, and compressed volatility. That world is gone. In its place is an environment that distributes risk unevenly – creating distinct winners and losers across countries, sectors, and asset classes.

Navigating that dispersion requires flexibility: the ability to rotate, adjust, and exploit dislocations that a passive index, by construction, cannot. In our view, agile, multi‑sector approaches are best positioned for this environment, where it will be critically important to price risk objectively. Successful investors will need to discern across multiple sectors and security types, as well as liquidity profiles, to choose the best risk adjusted opportunities to deliver returns.

Read more: Higher Energy Costs, Weaker Tax Relief Squeeze U.S. Households