A Resilient Labor Market Delays Fed Cuts

Last week was very strong for the market narrative because the economic data continued to show resilience where it matters most: jobs, earnings, and investor confidence. The latest payroll report was not just stronger than expected; it showed broad private-sector strength, with government jobs actually declining and the prior month revised higher. That is an important distinction. We are not looking at artificial strength coming from public-sector hiring. We are seeing firms continue to absorb workers in the last two months at a pace well above what many economists now consider steady-state growth.

The unemployment rate held steady, participation slipped slightly, and wage growth came in a little light at 3.6% year-over-year. That wage number is important because it is not running away from the Fed, but it also means workers are barely keeping pace with inflation if headline CPI moves toward the expected 3.7% year-over-year reading next week. This is not the kind of labor report that argues for an immediate rate cut. Jobless claims remain near the very bottom of their long-term range, at 200,000, and we simply are not seeing evidence of layoffs or labor market deterioration. The Fed can take comfort that wage pressure is not accelerating, but it cannot justify aggressive easing with this level of employment strength.

The June 17 Fed meeting will therefore be one of the most important in years, not only because of the policy decision, but because of how Chair Warsh frames the balance between growth, inflation, and the appropriate level of the Fed funds rate. At current levels, with the 10-year Treasury around 4.37% and overnight money in the mid-3s, there is not a strong argument for major easing. I still believe the long bond is likely to settle in a 4.5% to 5% range given the strength of the economy and the persistence of inflation.

But the bond market has shown remarkable strength despite heavy Treasury issuance, and if the 10-Year were to move closer to 4%, because of either weakening consumer spending or non-energy-related prices declining, Warsh would have a stronger argument to lower the funds rate by another 25 basis points. Historically, a spread of roughly 100 basis points between the 10-Year and the funds rate is a reasonable benchmark, and that framework suggests only limited room for easing unless long rates fall further.

Read more: Powell Stays…Should the Dot Plot?